After quitting/ Is a border really a straight line?

 As I have gained age and still wondered at the world, and as years have passed and the understandibg influenced by technology is no longer so very elementary, I have begun to wonder, in what sense is war at the borders, isn't more likely that defending good living conditilns is a more complex thing, demanding understanding life much more. 

I have also noticed that some people are constantly unhappy because they want to folliw some foreign culture and have the chaces for it, but somehow it does not suit here, does not make them happy here. And when there is somewhere some piece of just traditional Fknnish culture, it usually works out really well and makes people happy, satisfied with life, maybe knowing better in which climate they would lije to live even if not in this one. So many tend to think that there is some unfair suppirt for Finnish ways, while I think that it is an unfair lack of support. Anyway, in a certain place at certain time in history some things suit there, work out there well and others don't. And so in that sense the place at that period belongs to tge well workkng nice culture there. And similarly in other respects, some choices may be better there than other optilns tried. And so some say that in a way professions, hobbies, cultural assets etc still conquer places, towns etc, but it rarely makes sense to group all professilns together and draw one border for all purposes. I mean some say that shops etc still conquer places but for others the situations are slmewhat too unclear and messy, maybe falsely observed.